READER AND VISITOR FORUM

1. WE ONLY MEAN TO INFLAME, NOT OFFEND! 

The great crackpot debate is over and both men are shown to be men of honor!

Dr. Monreal is not associated or affiliated with this website in any way!  He is the last honest man on the web, willing to put his name to his criticisms, and showing dignity and grace.   (Something Pauline also has in spades and keeps telling me I need more of)

Hopefully a happy ending?

We have commisioned Dr. Monreal to analyze the inherent physics involved in the Goswami-Fenwick solution to the Greyson Challenge.  We will print his response in its entirety without editing. Also he has promised a short "blurb" along the lines of "Bravo", or "Bogus", or "Doesn't violate the known laws of physcis but is speculative.""

 COMING SOON: THE CRACKPOT DETECTIVE!

We have commisioned a complete unknown, certainly NOT Dr. Monreal, to take on Michael Shermer as the reigning Crackpot Detective! We will take on real targets, such as Princeton University's Psyleron Device, or applying Shermer's Why People Believe Weird Things to the concept of quantum non-locality and quantum consciousness and see if these concepts are cracked.

(Roger Penrose calls them a "pipedream" in his new book The Road to Reality!)

TERRANCE WITTE KNOWS STEADY STATE RAMIFICATIONS!

Terrance! You animal! Blasting your critics into dark dark cyberspace with the release of your article in Physics Essays! You ride motorcross, fly your own plane, solved the math of the chaotic beating of the human heart, and now poking a big stick in the eye of quantum physics.

TERRANCE KNOWS DARK HYDROGEN: OH YEAH

Roger Penrose states that the next great advance in physics will come from an outsider working in isolation!  Could he be talking about Terrance Witte?

Check out his book at nullphysics.com.  Terrance doesn't talk trash.  He just publishes and silences his critics.  If you want to "borrow" my copy of his article entitled
"Einstein's nonphysical geometry and intergalactic redshift", in Physics Essays Vol 21 #3 September 2008, email me and I will "lend" it to you, if you promise to return it. Otherwise, buy your own copy at www.physicsessays.com

2. MARIO BEAUREGARD STATES IN "THE SPIRITUAL BRAIN" THAT THERE IS NO GOD SPOT!  WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS!

(Click here for my initial response and then read below for my response to the flood of criticism that followed my first response.)

WHY DO WE HAVE AND NEED A GOD SPOT?

Just as we need a "move our leg" spot, to move our legs, we need a "god" spot in our brains, to express and appreciate god in our lives. (the god that Pauline believes in that is). I think my god spot was accidentally replaced by a "Worship the Phillies" spot.

I, of course, love the beautiful spiritual insights in Dr. Beauregard's book The Spiritual Brain, and I deeply admire his courage in sharing with us his own spiritual experiences and what seems to have been a near death experience.

Many people have written to me and said "well Dr. Beauregard and Dr. van Lommel are good buds, and yet you say Beauregard doesn't understand van Lommel. Yes. That is in fact what I am saying. Remember Beauregard's book came out in 2006, so it was written in 2005.  I certainly have learned a lot since 2005, maybe Beauregard has too. We will find out at the big "Is There a God Spot World Wide Smack Down" the University of Montreal is sponsoring this Spring.